<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alex Byers » Using digital technologies to better an analog world &#187; word processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byersalex.com/tag/word-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byersalex.com</link>
	<description>Using digital technologies to better an analog world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching spellcheck dictionaries to forget</title>
		<link>http://www.byersalex.com/2009/07/teaching-spellcheck-dictionaries-to-forget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.byersalex.com/2009/07/teaching-spellcheck-dictionaries-to-forget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Byers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifehacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catastrophes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word processing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byersalex.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My idea would give word processors the ability to do just the opposite: forget words.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to expand a bit on a <a href="http://twitter.com/byersalex/status/2539229936">tweet</a> I posted last week that may have been lacking some context.</p>
<p>The idea I floated had to do with word processors and their spellcheck libraries. In Microsoft Word and other software, you can tell the program to &#8220;learn&#8221; words. Effectively, you&#8217;re telling the computer to not put a curvy red line beneath a given word. Examples of this might include a last name you write frequently, the name of a product, or any other word you use often that might not be a real word.</p>
<p>My idea would give word processors the ability to do just the opposite: forget words.</p>
<p>If a word is forgotten, the program would automatically put the red line below the word, regardless of whether or not it is misspelled. Why would you want to do this? Read on, friends.</p>
<p><em>The following situation may seem slightly farfetched, but I&#8217;m certain it&#8217;s plausible. In addition, there are other, more likely examples, but as I&#8217;ve personally experienced one of them, I&#8217;d rather not share it. </em><strong><em>WARNING:</em></strong><em> Potty language is upcoming.</em></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re a copywriter for an ad agency, You&#8217;re working on an ad for a new energy drink, and the idea behind the project is that it&#8217;s not for the faint (of heart.) In your copy, you write the following &#8211; Energy Drink: Not for the faint.</p>
<p>Except you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>See, the t and f letters are in close proximity on your standard keyboard. You mistakenly write taint, not faint. The word processor reads taint as correctly spelled, thinking of the verb that means to skew or otherwise negatively adjust. Your boss, however, reads the word taint as a slang term for a certain rarely-seen part of the male body.</p>
<p>Ouch. But if you had told the computer to automatically highlight taint, you would have been much more likely to catch the mistake in the editing process. You&#8217;d have saved yourself from a pretty big embarassment.</p>
<p>I know there are likely a million flaws or with this idea (or better fixes, like, uh, improving your editing.) But we all make stupid mistakes &#8211; I have to think this would help avoid a few of them. Am I crazy?</p>
<p>By the way, I wrote nearly this entire post on a Blackberry via WordPress&#8217; new mobile software. Stuff is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.byersalex.com/2009/07/teaching-spellcheck-dictionaries-to-forget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
