Three small ways to make life easier using Google products

May 24, 2010 | Lifehacking | No Comments

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last five years or are a Bing or Yahoo employee, you’re probably plugged into the Google cloud one way or another. Some only do GMail, some do GMail and Docs, and some to GMail, Docs, Calendar, Reader, Wave, Labs, News, and pretty much anything that will shove them further under the oversight of our Google overlords. (Just kidding.)

While there is certainly reason to have some concern about being too plugged into the cloud – downtime, security, and personal data sharing come to mind – spending most of your web time with some Google-based window open in front of you can have its benefits. In particular, I put a creative twist on using Google applications to make my life easier in three ways.

Using drafts as a to-do list

Everyone needs a to-do list. Some are more old-school and use a real-world pen and paper, but going digital certainly works better for me. I need one that’s Internet-based – one that I can access from anywhere. The problem? A lot of online task managers (like Remember The Milk) have too many moving parts for what I need. I don’t require a place to perfectly categorize each task, note its expected duration, or include a due date. Quite simply, I just want somewhere that I can jot down some text quickly and access it even quicker.

The solution? GMail drafts. I have one draft with the subject of “To do” that I continually update with tasks for the day and week. Because I almost always have a GMail window open, it takes no time to call up the draft and remember what I need to accomplish. Simple and sufficient.

Tracking what you track with Google Docs

Tracking is all the rage. Whatever you may track – for me, it’s what I eat – tracking on a computer will certainly give you the best opportunity analyze your data at a later date and draw useful conclusions. Again, however, it’s useful to have access to your data at more than one location, so you can both update and check your tracker at any point.

Google Docs gets the job done here. Set up a nice spreadsheet (complete with formulas for addition and averages, if you like) and you’ve got a no-frills place to track your data that’s available anywhere.

Organize your Inbox Zero

The ‘Getting Things Done‘ religion of productivity has been on the rise for some time now, and the concept of Inbox Zero is probably the most famous component of the practice. The concept is simple: by acting on your e-mail when you receive it (responding, deleting, archiving, saving for later, etc.), you encourage movement on tasks and prevent the piling up of deadlines and to-dos.

Following Inbox Zero (which is the child of Merlin Mann’s 43 Folders) essentially turns your inbox into a to-do list, which can be quite useful, with one drawback: what to do when you’ve completed a task, but need response from another party for the project. You could leave it in your inbox so as not to forget about it and let it clutter up your otherwise clean list, or you could archive it to signify its completeness and risk forgetting you need some type of response from someone else.

The GMail fix? Use multiple inboxes, a GMail labs option that allows users to see multiple lists of e-mail in the same window. Simply create a “needs reply” label for those messages that for which you need a response, and set up a second inbox list that displays any messages with the “needs reply” label. Then you can archive the message, removing it from your main inbox (and de facto to-do list) while keeping it visible in your secondary list.

Tags: , , , , ,

As time goes by

August 18, 2009 | Lifehacking, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

WHERE HAS THE TIME GONE.

I’m leaving on a jet plane, back to the District on Thursday. I couldn’t be more excited to get back to school, start really cracking over at The Hatchet, and work my senior year to its fullest, but I do wonder what happened to the last seven weeks I spent in Minnesota.

It would have been hard to ask for a much better short-term summer break – a trip to Arizona, plenty of relaxation, cutting a few strokes off my golf handicap – but I’d be lying if I said I felt like I accomplished everything I wanted to this summer. I had hoped that my time in the midwest would be a digital retreat of sorts – where I would get up to speed and learn everything I could ever need to know about journalism and the web and social media and the like.

That didn’t happen.

In fact, when I make a list of the things I still need to catch up with, it’s a list much longer than I’d like:

  • Figure out how to really use LinkedIn
  • Figure what Publish2 really is and how I can use it personally and for The Hatchet
  • Learn how to code in Javascript
  • Write posts here much more frequently
  • Complete roughly six thousand more minor tasks for The Hatchet
  • Record some music
  • Practice my video and still photography skills
  • Write a particularly important post I’ve been saving up that is essentially the mission statement of this blog.
  • Many more tasks that has wasted away into oblivion

Maybe it hasn’t been so bad. Actually, it hasn’t – it’s been great. But when you follow [read: try to learn from] so many smart people who seem light years ahead, it’s hard not to feel a little lazy.

Here’s to picking up the slack.

Teaching spellcheck dictionaries to forget

July 13, 2009 | Lifehacking | 5 Comments

I want to expand a bit on a tweet I posted last week that may have been lacking some context.

The idea I floated had to do with word processors and their spellcheck libraries. In Microsoft Word and other software, you can tell the program to “learn” words. Effectively, you’re telling the computer to not put a curvy red line beneath a given word. Examples of this might include a last name you write frequently, the name of a product, or any other word you use often that might not be a real word.

My idea would give word processors the ability to do just the opposite: forget words.

If a word is forgotten, the program would automatically put the red line below the word, regardless of whether or not it is misspelled. Why would you want to do this? Read on, friends.

The following situation may seem slightly farfetched, but I’m certain it’s plausible. In addition, there are other, more likely examples, but as I’ve personally experienced one of them, I’d rather not share it. WARNING: Potty language is upcoming.

Let’s say you’re a copywriter for an ad agency, You’re working on an ad for a new energy drink, and the idea behind the project is that it’s not for the faint (of heart.) In your copy, you write the following – Energy Drink: Not for the faint.

Except you don’t.

See, the t and f letters are in close proximity on your standard keyboard. You mistakenly write taint, not faint. The word processor reads taint as correctly spelled, thinking of the verb that means to skew or otherwise negatively adjust. Your boss, however, reads the word taint as a slang term for a certain rarely-seen part of the male body.

Ouch. But if you had told the computer to automatically highlight taint, you would have been much more likely to catch the mistake in the editing process. You’d have saved yourself from a pretty big embarassment.

I know there are likely a million flaws or with this idea (or better fixes, like, uh, improving your editing.) But we all make stupid mistakes – I have to think this would help avoid a few of them. Am I crazy?

By the way, I wrote nearly this entire post on a Blackberry via WordPress’ new mobile software. Stuff is awesome.

Tags: ,