Greg Linch takes a wide-angle look at how we measure our journalism and asks how we could quantify impact.

I think a lot of this mainly consists of cherry-picked examples of what are probably less than stellar fact checks, but it’s no doubt a topic that needs some healthy scrutiny:

They call themselves “fact checkers,” and with the name comes a veneer of objectivity doubling as a license to go after any remark by a public figure they find disagreeable for any reason.

Andrew Spittle drops/curates some knowledge about the reading experience on news sites and the subtle importance of single-page views. For my part, I’ve damn near taken to reading articles on their print-friendly pages.

This is a beautiful and interactive explainer piece from The Times, addressing an increasingly complex area of campaign finance law. Bravo.

But the $64,000 question is if they can, on a regular basis, keep it in front of the people that need to see it. Few people are going to find it on their own — inserting it as a contextual element on relevant stories will be crucial.

Homicide Watch (run by 2011 ONA MJ Bear fellow Laura Amico) got written up this week for some crafty analytics work. Sure, using search queries to track down a murder victim’s identity is probably easier when you’re a one-woman shop, but local news outfits should use this tactic too.

— via Poynter